Pengaruh Penggunaan Al Generatif Terhadap Physics Learning Anxiety dan Motivasi Belajar Peserta Didik
Main Article Content
Abstract
Physics learning anxiety is one of the psychological factors that influences the motivation and physics learning outcomes of high school students. This study aims to analyze the effect of generative AI use on students’ physics learning anxiety and learning motivation. The research employed a quasi-experimental method with a pretest–posttest control group design involving 60 high school students divided into experimental and control groups. The experimental group participated in learning activities using generative AI, while the control group received conventional instruction. The research instruments consisted of a physics learning anxiety questionnaire and a learning motivation questionnaire that had been tested for validity and reliability. Data were analyzed using appropriate statistical tests. The results show that the use of generative AI significantly reduces students’ physics learning anxiety and increases their learning motivation compared to conventional learning. These findings indicate that generative AI is effective as a learning medium that can reduce learning anxiety and enhance students’ motivation, and it has implications for its use as an innovative and adaptive learning medium in physics education.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Azwar, S. (2015). Penyusunan skala psikologi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Houghton Mifflin.
Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation. Rand McNally.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Boston: Pearson.
Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). London: Sage Publications.
Ghozali, I. (2018). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan SPSS. Badan Penerbit UNDIP.
Goetz, T., et al. (2006). Students’ emotions in academic learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 31(3), 322–350.
Hwang, G. J., & Tu, Y. F. (2021). Roles of AI in education. Educational Technology & Society, 24(3), 1–15.
Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 140, 1–55.
Luckin, R., et al. (2016). Intelligence Unleashed: An Argument for AI in Education. Pearson.
Moleong, L. J. (2017). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
OECD. (2021). AI in Education: Challenges and Opportunities. OECD Publishing
Pekrun, R. (2017). Emotion and achievement during adolescence. Child Development Perspectives, 11(3), 215–221.
Putwain, D. W., et al. (2018). Academic anxiety and motivation. Educational Psychology, 38(4), 1–18.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory. Motivation Science, 3(2), 133–147.
S. Sahin et al., “Physics Anxiety: A Review of the Literature,” Journal of Turkish Science Education 12, no. 2 (2015): 3-10.
Schunk, D. H., Meece, J. L., & Pintrich, P. R. (2014). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications. Pearson.
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian pendidikan: Pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Winkler, R., & Söllner, M. (2018). Unleashing the potential of chatbots. ICIS Proceedings.
X. Zhai, “ChatGPT User Experience: Implications for Education,” SSRN Electronic Journal (2022), https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4312418.
Zawacki-Richter, O., et al. (2019). Systematic review of AI in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16 (39).